Peter E. Stokes

85 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Peter E. Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 844
  • Biological Psychiatry 81
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 256
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 771
  • Pharmacology 459
Replace Samuel Craig Risch with:
Samuel Craig Risch United States
Robert H. Gerner United States
Paul J. Orsulak United States
Morris A. Lipton United States
Hanns Hippius Germany
Miki Bloch Israel
Frăncesca Brambilla Italy
Paolo Prolo United States
David Ted George United States
Ronit Weizman Israel
Peter E. Stokes relative to Samuel Craig Risch United States Samuel Craig Risch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Samuel Craig Risch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter E. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter E. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter E. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter E. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter E. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter E. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter E. Stokes. The network helps show where Peter E. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter E. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter E. Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Peter E. Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984336
2 1970311
3 1985209
4 1995160
5 1985139
6 1997104
7 197596
8 199388
9 199284
10 199383
11 197369
12 199865
13 199764
14 198063
15 198463
16 197655
17 198655
18 198755
19 198853
20 198252

About Peter E. Stokes

Peter E. Stokes is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 86 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (34 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (19 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (13 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (6 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (844 citations), Biological Psychiatry (81 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (256 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (771 citations) and Pharmacology (459 citations). Peter E. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James H. Kocsis, Melvin S. Schwartz, ROBERT G. BRAYTON, Donald B. Louria, Carolyn R. Sikes, Stephen H. Koslow, Peter Stoll, Charles P. Pollak, Charles L. Bowden and Regina C. Casper. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Affective Disorders and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact