Peter Stoll

96 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Peter Stoll
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 185
  • Biological Psychiatry 110
  • Oral Surgery 144
  • Animal Science and Zoology 204
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 257
Replace Keiichi Tsukinoki with:
Keiichi Tsukinoki Japan
Pontus Stierna Sweden
Mehmet Turgut Türkiye
C. David France
Ana Paula Ligeiro de Oliveira Brazil
Deqin Yang China
Justin H. Turner United States
W. M. H. Behan United Kingdom
Richard Létourneau United States
Carl Gemzell Sweden
Peter Stoll relative to Keiichi Tsukinoki Japan Keiichi Tsukinoki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.6×
Keiichi Tsukinoki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stoll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stoll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stoll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stoll. The network helps show where Peter Stoll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stoll Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stoll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997216
2 2001158
3 2017152
4 1998146
5 2017142
6 197595
7 198655
8 198853
9 198642
10 199142
11 199240
12 202036
13 199635
14 201632
15 199732
16 199731
17 198430
18 202125
19 201822
20 198921

About Peter Stoll

Peter Stoll is a scholar working on Surgery, Animal Science and Zoology, Oral Surgery, Small Animals and Oncology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (14 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (13 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (185 citations), Biological Psychiatry (110 citations), Oral Surgery (144 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (204 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (257 citations). Peter Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Bähr, Rüdiger Wächter, Claus D. Claussen, Markus Müller‐Schimpfle, Peter E. Stokes, Klaus Dietz, P. Schlegel, Lotti Egger, Reto Portmann and Guy Vergères. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, animal, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren and International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact