Peter Stoll

86 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Peter Stoll
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 195
  • Oral Surgery 124
  • Animal Science and Zoology 136
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 262
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 77
Replace N. D. Kantharia with:
N. D. Kantharia India
Lijuan Sun China
Keiichi Tsukinoki Japan
Allan Bardow Denmark
Oskar Lundgren Sweden
Hyungsuk Kim South Korea
Cristina de Oliveira Massoco Brazil
Gianpaolo Ronconi Italy
Paolo Usai Italy
Jean Cassuto Sweden
Peter Stoll relative to N. D. Kantharia India N. D. Kantharia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.5×
N. D. Kantharia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stoll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stoll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stoll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stoll. The network helps show where Peter Stoll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stoll Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stoll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997221
2 2001159
3 2017158
4 2017150
5 1998148
6 197596
7 198655
8 198853
9 199444
10 198642
11 199142
12 199241
13 202039
14 199635
15 201633
16 199732
17 199731
18 198429
19 202126
20 201825

About Peter Stoll

Peter Stoll is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Animal Science and Zoology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (16 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (14 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (5 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (195 citations), Oral Surgery (124 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (136 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (262 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (77 citations). Peter Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rüdiger Wächter, Claus Detlef Claussen, Markus Müller‐Schimpfle, Peter E. Stokes, P. Schlegel, Klaus Dietz, Christian Baumann, Guy Vergères, Reto Portmann and Lotti Egger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, animal, Journal of Psychiatric Research and RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact