Peter Cook

24 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

Peter Cook
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Architecture 8
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 22
  • Social Psychology 28
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 6
Replace Gena R. Greher with:
Gena R. Greher United States
Josh Adams United States
Kristina Wiebels New Zealand
Russell J. Boag Netherlands
Yvonnick Noël France
Chrysovalantis Kefalis Greece
Tony Glover United Kingdom
Peter M. Nelson United States
Sandra Grinschgl Austria
Thi Duong Australia
Peter Cook relative to Gena R. Greher United States Gena R. Greher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gena R. Greher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cook. The network helps show where Peter Cook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Cook Line = papers co-authored together Peter Cook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197543
2 199930
3 201016
4 197613
5 200813
6 200912
7 198311
8 20248
9 19836
10 19924
11 20154
12 20074
13 20223
14
Morphosis: Buildings and Projects
19903
15 20203
16
Helen & Hard : relational design
20122
17 19882
18 20162
19
Power of contemporary architecture
19991
20
The Paradox of Contemporary Architecture
20011

About Peter Cook

Peter Cook is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Small Animals, having authored 30 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper), Open Source Software Innovations (1 paper), Nuclear Issues and Defense (1 paper) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (8 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (47 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (22 citations), Social Psychology (28 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (6 citations). Peter Cook has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include George Singer, M.J. Wayner, Mark C. Wallace, Margaret Wilson, Margaret Richards, Meredith Wallace, Michael W. Doyle, Samuel Fosso Wamba, Shah Jahan Miah and Curt Tausky. Their work appears in journals such as Physiology & Behavior, Transfer European Review of Labour and Research, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Annals of Operations Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact