Peter Connelly

31 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Peter Connelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 122
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 16
  • Physiology 106
Replace Chris D. Corcoran with:
Chris D. Corcoran United States
A. Pfeffer Poland
Maddalena La Montagna Italy
E Łuczywek Poland
Chay‐Hoon Tan Singapore
Pier Luigi Scapicchio Italy
Elena Mariani Italy
Fumiko Irie Australia
Fran M. Gengo United States
Mei‐Chuan Chou Taiwan
Peter Connelly relative to Chris D. Corcoran United States Chris D. Corcoran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Chris D. Corcoran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Connelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Connelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Connelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Connelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Connelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Connelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Connelly. The network helps show where Peter Connelly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Connelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Connelly Line = papers co-authored together Peter Connelly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200374
2 200773
3 198759
4 200542
5 201431
6 201229
7 198721
8 200514
9 201312
10
The Effect of Understanding Issues of Personal Finance on the Well-being of Physicians in Training.
201812
11 201111
12 20199
13 20139
14 20217
15 19927
16 20057
17 20167
18
Modern war surgery: the experience of Bosnia. 2: The clinical experience.
19957
19 20096
20 20046

About Peter Connelly

Peter Connelly is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Pharmacology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (122 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations) and Physiology (106 citations). Peter Connelly has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Emma Law, Neil Prentice, G. J. Naylor, Kieran C. Breen, Rachel Sayer, Jim Bonham, John M. Starr, Mario A. Parra, Tom C. Russ and Neil Ward. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, International Psychogeriatrics and Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact