Beth Howden

526 citations
8 papers · 320 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Beth Howden

8 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Beth Howden
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 59
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 127
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 64
  • Reproductive Medicine 16
  • Pharmacy 8
Replace Gretchen Collins with:
Gretchen Collins United States
Diony Young United States
Chanda Karki Nepal
Jennifer K. Bello United States
Jessica L. Gleason United States
Peter St. Marie United States
Susan Iles United Kingdom
Sali̇me Mucuk Türkiye
Gabriela Chico‐Barba Mexico
Andrea Akkad United Kingdom
Beth Howden relative to Gretchen Collins United States Gretchen Collins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Gretchen Collins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Howden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Howden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Howden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Howden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Howden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Howden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Howden. The network helps show where Beth Howden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Beth Howden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Howden Line = papers co-authored together Beth Howden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2014148
2 201655
3 201533
4
The Family-Nurse Partnership programme in England: wave 1 implementation in toddlerhood and a comparison between waves 1 and 2a of implementation in pregnancy and infancy
201129
5 201726
6 201920
7
Eligibility for the Family Nurse Partnership programme: testing new criteria
20127
8 20202

About Beth Howden

Beth Howden is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper), Migration, Health and Trauma (1 paper), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (59 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (127 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (64 citations), Reproductive Medicine (16 citations) and Pharmacy (8 citations). Beth Howden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dilisha Patel, Judith Stephenson, Jill Shawe, Geraldine Barrett, Pranav Pandya, Andrew Copas, Mog Ball, Jacqueline Barnes, Jeremy Horwood and J. Athene Lane. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, PLoS ONE and Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact