Countries where authors publish in Brain Communications
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Communications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Communications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Communications more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Brain Communications
This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Communications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Communications.
About Brain Communications
The 1.9k papers published in Brain Communications in the last decades have received a total of 18.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Brain Communications usually cover Neurology (504 papers), Neurology (250 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (600 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (386 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (335 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (299 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (233 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (211 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (189 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (173 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (154 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (148 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Communications are Edmund T. Rolls, Wei Cheng, Jianfeng Feng, John Hardy, Raj N. Kalaria, Karen Ritchie, Yoshiki Hase, Andrew N. Clarkson, Valentina Escott‐Price and Tam Watermeyer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.