Peter Case

82 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Peter Case
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 415
  • Oral Surgery 130
  • Communication 148
  • Marketing 164
  • Demography 166
Replace Jennifer Clark with:
Jennifer Clark United States
Deborah Blackman Australia
Jenny Onyx Australia
Derek Layder United Kingdom
Shalini Srivastava India
De Vaus
John Flint United Kingdom
Ignasi Brunet Icart Spain
Linda Schweitzer Canada
Shiv Ganesh New Zealand
Peter Case relative to Jennifer Clark United States Jennifer Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.3×
Jennifer Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Case

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Case's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Case with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Case more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Case

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Case. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Case. The network helps show where Peter Case may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Case, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Case Line = papers co-authored together Peter Case links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003178
2 2013137
3 2010104
4 1979103
5 199869
6 201562
7 201560
8 200060
9 197953
10 201550
11 201744
12 199941
13 200240
14 201440
15 201337
16 201636
17 201930
18 200629
19 200729
20 201829

About Peter Case

Peter Case is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Education and Communication, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (23 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (7 papers), Management Theory and Practice (6 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers), Global and Cross-Cultural Management (5 papers), Agricultural Systems and Practices (5 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (5 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (415 citations), Oral Surgery (130 citations), Communication (148 citations), Marketing (164 citations) and Demography (166 citations). Peter Case has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Glauco De Vita, Jonathan Gosling, Russell I. Haley, Keith Grint, Alex J. Moule, Trevor Holcombe, Andrew K. Ringsmuth, Simon Catling, Bill Kahler and Murray Prideaux. Their work appears in journals such as Management Learning, Culture and Organization, Leadership, Organization and Journal of Management Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact