Peter Ashworth

61 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Peter Ashworth
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Research and Theory 147
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 103
  • Health Informatics 93
  • Safety Research 423
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 106
Replace Margaret Bearman with:
Margaret Bearman Australia
Diana Dolmans Netherlands
Caroline Bradbury‐Jones United Kingdom
Cormac McGrath Sweden
Ysanne Chapman Australia
Duncan David Nulty Australia
Rola Ajjawi Australia
Peter Draper United Kingdom
Ronald M. Cervero United States
Kati Utriainen Finland
Peter Ashworth relative to Margaret Bearman Australia Margaret Bearman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Margaret Bearman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ashworth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ashworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ashworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ashworth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ashworth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ashworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ashworth. The network helps show where Peter Ashworth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ashworth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ashworth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ashworth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997374
2 2000242
3 1990157
4 2000153
5 2008141
6 1998136
7 2007133
8 1993128
9 1998123
10 1992100
11 200381
12 199973
13 200371
14 199668
15 199156
16 199051
17 200348
18 200742
19 200141
20 199240

About Peter Ashworth

Peter Ashworth is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers), Social Representations and Identity (9 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (4 papers) and Adult and Continuing Education Topics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (147 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (103 citations), Health Informatics (93 citations), Safety Research (423 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (106 citations). Peter Ashworth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ursula Lucas, Kate Gerrish, Paul Morrison, Anne Lacey, Kay Greasley, Juliana Saxton, R. Heather Macdonald, Sally Kendall, Jo Cooke and Elaine McNeilly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, Journal of Further and Higher Education and Studies in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact