Peter Armour
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Papers in
- History 12
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 12
-
- Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism 4
- Historical and Literary Analyses 2
- Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity 1
- Co-authors
- Steven Botterill (5 shared papers)Angus Mackay (1 shared paper)Vittorio Russo (1 shared paper)Zygmunt G. Barański (2 shared papers)Guido Bonsaver (2 shared papers)Peter Hainsworth (4 shared papers)Jonathan D. Smith (2 shared papers)Richard Mackenney (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Italian Studies (10 papers)The Modern Language Review (9 papers)Australian Journal of Social Issues (1 paper)Quaderni d italianistica (1 paper)Romance Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Italy
In The Last Decade
Peter Armour
11 papers receiving 64 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Classics 52
- Linguistics and Language 26
- Language and Linguistics 43
- History 41
- Literature and Literary Theory 40
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Armour
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Armour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Armour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Armour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Armour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Armour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Armour. The network helps show where Peter Armour may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Armour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 40 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 25 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 18 | Dante soundings : eight literary and historical essays | 1981 | 1 |
| 19 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 1 |
About Peter Armour
Peter Armour is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 132 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (12 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers), Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity (1 paper), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (52 citations), Linguistics and Language (26 citations), Language and Linguistics (43 citations), History (41 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (40 citations). Peter Armour has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include Steven Botterill, Angus Mackay, Vittorio Russo, Zygmunt G. Barański, Guido Bonsaver, Peter Hainsworth, Jonathan D. Smith, Richard Mackenney, Nicholas H. Mann and Cecil H. Clough. Their work appears in journals such as Italian Studies, The Modern Language Review, Australian Journal of Social Issues, Quaderni d italianistica and Romance Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.