Jane E. Everson
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Conor Fahy (1 shared paper)Zygmunt G. Barański (2 shared papers)Jonathan D. Smith (2 shared papers)Richard Mackenney (2 shared papers)Nicholas H. Mann (1 shared paper)Guido Bonsaver (2 shared papers)Peter Hainsworth (4 shared papers)Cecil H. Clough (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (8 papers)Italian Studies (4 papers)Music and Letters (1 paper)Renaissance Studies (1 paper)Quaderni d italianistica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Jane E. Everson
13 papers receiving 63 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Classics 31
- History 53
- Linguistics and Language 22
- Language and Linguistics 33
- General Arts and Humanities 3
Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Everson
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Everson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Everson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Everson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Everson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Everson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Everson. The network helps show where Jane E. Everson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Everson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0 |
About Jane E. Everson
Jane E. Everson is a scholar working on Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (6 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (6 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (5 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (31 citations), History (53 citations), Linguistics and Language (22 citations), Language and Linguistics (33 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (3 citations). Jane E. Everson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Conor Fahy, Zygmunt G. Barański, Jonathan D. Smith, Richard Mackenney, Nicholas H. Mann, Guido Bonsaver, Peter Hainsworth, Cecil H. Clough, David Robey and Peter Armour. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Italian Studies, Music and Letters, Renaissance Studies and Quaderni d italianistica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.