Lino Pertile

490 citations
34 papers · 79 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 13
    • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books 5
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 8

Lino Pertile

16 papers receiving 40 citations

Peers

Lino Pertile
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • General Arts and Humanities 8
  • Classics 20
  • History 37
  • Literature and Literary Theory 18
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 7
Replace Letizia Panizza with:
Letizia Panizza United Kingdom
Mario Praz
Amedeo Quondam Italy
C. P. Brand
Alberto Asor Rosa
Filippomaria Pontani Italy
Vittore Branca United States
Anne Lake Prescott United States
Giorgio Inglese
Karlheinz Stierle France
Lino Pertile relative to Letizia Panizza United Kingdom Letizia Panizza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Letizia Panizza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lino Pertile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lino Pertile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lino Pertile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lino Pertile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lino Pertile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lino Pertile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lino Pertile. The network helps show where Lino Pertile may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lino Pertile, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lino Pertile Line = papers co-authored together Lino Pertile links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199915
2 197114
3 20078
4 19984
5
La punta del disio : semantica del desiderio nella Commedia
20054
6 19974
7 19913
8
The New Italian Novel
19973
9 19763
10 19873
11 19973
12 19992
13 20002
14 20211
15 19881
16 19741
17 20191
18 19981
19 19981
20 19851

About Lino Pertile

Lino Pertile is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, General Arts and Humanities and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 79 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (13 papers), Italian Literature and Culture (11 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (8 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (7 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (6 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (6 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (5 papers) and Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Arts and Humanities (8 citations), Classics (20 citations), History (37 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (18 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (7 citations). Lino Pertile has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Brand, Sydney Anglo, Konrad Eisenbichler, Zygmunt G. Barański, Teodolinda Barolini, Rocco Capozzi, Franco Simone, David Wallace, Joan M. Ferrante and Albert Russell Ascoli. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Italian Studies, The Italianist, Speculum and Quaderni d italianistica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact