Michael Bertram Crowe
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Augustinian Studies and Theology
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 5
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 2
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 1
- Co-authors
- Jonathan C. Barnes (1 shared paper)Peter Armour (1 shared paper)J. H. Whitfield (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Irish Theological Quarterly (6 papers)The American Journal of Jurisprudence (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- Ireland
In The Last Decade
Michael Bertram Crowe
24 papers receiving 102 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Philosophy 68
- History and Philosophy of Science 11
- General Psychology 3
- Religious studies 9
- Political Science and International Relations 40
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bertram Crowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bertram Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bertram Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bertram Crowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bertram Crowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bertram Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bertram Crowe. The network helps show where Michael Bertram Crowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bertram Crowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 36 | |
| 2 | 1969 | 21 | |
| 3 | 1964 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1964 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1960 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1956 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1961 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1967 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1959 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1960 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1968 | 1 |
About Michael Bertram Crowe
Michael Bertram Crowe is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper), Catholicism and Religious Studies (1 paper), French Urban and Social Studies (1 paper) and Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (68 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations), General Psychology (3 citations), Religious studies (9 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (40 citations). Michael Bertram Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan C. Barnes, Peter Armour and J. H. Whitfield. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Theological Quarterly, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.