David Robey

559 citations
33 papers · 238 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 7
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 5
    • Medieval Literature and History 2

David Robey

18 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers

David Robey
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Classics 38
  • Literature and Literary Theory 51
  • Linguistics and Language 21
  • Language and Linguistics 42
  • History 31
Replace Boris Uspenskij with:
Boris Uspenskij Russia
Heda Jason
Fernando Lázaro Carreter Italy
Ju. M. Lotman
Bernard Cerquiglini Canada
Chad Wellmon United States
Antoine Compagnon France
Kristoffel Demoen Belgium
John Biguenet
David Bellos United States
David Robey relative to Boris Uspenskij Russia Boris Uspenskij's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Boris Uspenskij · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Robey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Robey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Robey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Robey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Robey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Robey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Robey. The network helps show where David Robey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Robey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Robey Line = papers co-authored together David Robey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198470
2 197459
3 199325
4 198424
5
E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK
200821
6 200010
7 19906
8 19774
9 19902
10 19782
11 20202
12 19831
13 20171
14 19751
15 19711
16 20181
17 19751
18 20041
19 20051
20 20081

About David Robey

David Robey is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (7 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (5 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (1 paper) and Library Science and Information Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (38 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations), Linguistics and Language (21 citations), Language and Linguistics (42 citations) and History (31 citations). David Robey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Peter Rivière, Roger Cardinal, Ann Jefferson, Malcolm Heath, Michael Jubb, Peter Hainsworth, Zygmunt G. Barański, Jonathan D. Smith, Richard Mackenney and Nicholas H. Mann. Their work appears in journals such as Italian Studies, The Modern Language Review, Paragraph, History of Education and Studies in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact