Paul Stroemer

1.3k citations
17 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Stroemer

17 papers receiving 992 citations

Peers

Paul Stroemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Developmental Neuroscience 328
  • Genetics 296
  • Neurology 215
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 286
  • Rehabilitation 49
Replace Somsak Wattananit with:
Somsak Wattananit Sweden
Sara R Gregg United States
Martin Hadman United States
Anita Zaremba United States
Yana Mukhamedshina Russia
Lingxiao Deng United States
Sharon DeCesare United States
Andrew Hope United Kingdom
Zhida Su China
Janet E. Carter United Kingdom
Paul Stroemer relative to Somsak Wattananit Sweden Somsak Wattananit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Somsak Wattananit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Stroemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Stroemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Stroemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Stroemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Stroemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Stroemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Stroemer. The network helps show where Paul Stroemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Stroemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Stroemer Line = papers co-authored together Paul Stroemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2006233
2 2020132
3 2009123
4 201768
5 200365
6 201860
7 200358
8 201252
9 200741
10 199640
11 201338
12 200930
13 200729
14 200625
15 200022
16 200819
17 201517

About Paul Stroemer

Paul Stroemer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (6 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (2 papers) and S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (328 citations), Genetics (296 citations), Neurology (215 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (286 citations) and Rehabilitation (49 citations). Paul Stroemer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John D. Sinden, Sara Patel, Andrew Hope, Kenneth H. Pollock, Lara Stevanato, Helen Hodges, Erik Miljan, Jack Price, Ziping Dong and Randolph Corteling. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroreport, Stem Cells and Development, BMC Neuroscience, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Novartis Foundation symposium.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact