Janet E. Carter

1.4k citations
15 papers · 1.2k · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Carter

15 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Janet E. Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Developmental Neuroscience 394
  • Genetics 471
  • Neurology 170
  • Physiology 337
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 250
Replace Lidia De Filippis with:
Lidia De Filippis Italy
XiaoOu Mao United States
Guolong Yu China
Tali Ben‐Zur Israel
Anita Zaremba United States
Junichi Yamane Japan
Mina Maki United States
Abdelhak Belmadani United States
Giulietta Riboldi Italy
Ritchie Ho United States
Janet E. Carter relative to Lidia De Filippis Italy Lidia De Filippis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Lidia De Filippis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Carter. The network helps show where Janet E. Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Carter Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2009263
2 2010237
3 2002156
4 2007151
5 2014128
6 2010116
7 201362
8 201032
9 200221
10 201011
11 20018
12 19978
13 20134
14 20004
15 20143

About Janet E. Carter

Janet E. Carter is a scholar working on Physiology, Developmental Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (2 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (2 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (394 citations), Genetics (471 citations), Neurology (170 citations), Physiology (337 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (250 citations). Janet E. Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hee Kyung Jin, Edward H. Schuchman, Jong Kil Lee, Jae‐sung Bae, Jae‐Sung Bae, George W. Huntley, Shogo Endo, Hyun Ju Lee, Hyun-Woo Lee and Wonil Oh. Their work appears in journals such as Current Alzheimer Research, Stem Cells, Neurobiology of Aging, Journal of Clinical Investigation and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact