Countries where authors publish in Stem Cells and Development
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cells and Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cells and Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cells and Development more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Stem Cells and Development
This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cells and Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cells and Development.
About Stem Cells and Development
The 3.6k papers published in Stem Cells and Development in the last decades have received a total of 128.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Stem Cells and Development usually cover Genetics (1.2k papers), Developmental Neuroscience (291 papers), Hematology (466 papers), Molecular Biology (2.0k papers) and Cancer Research (292 papers) specifically the topics of Mesenchymal stem cell research (1.2k papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1.0k papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (494 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (421 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (375 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (277 papers), Renal and related cancers (226 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cells and Development are Jeremy J. Mao, Adel Alhadlaq, Ching‐Shwun Lin, Paul R. Sanberg, Hal E. Broxmeyer, Fatemeh Atashi, Ali Modarressi, Michael Sean Pepper, Mahendra S. Rao and Qin Han.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.