Patrick Joost

784 citations
13 papers · 606 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Patrick Joost

13 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

Patrick Joost
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 172
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 112
  • Cancer Research 72
  • Physiology 22
  • Oncology 109
Replace Michayla R. Williams with:
Michayla R. Williams United Kingdom
Jenny Flygare Sweden
Robert S. Fan United States
Christopher K. Means United States
Jingzhen Yuan United States
Lunshan Xu China
Moulay Driss Rochdi Canada
Juliana Karrim United States
Allison Stewart United Kingdom
Stephan Ryser Switzerland
Patrick Joost relative to Michayla R. Williams United Kingdom Michayla R. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Michayla R. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Joost

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Joost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Joost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Joost more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Joost

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Joost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Joost. The network helps show where Patrick Joost may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Joost, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Joost Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Joost links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002176
2 200399
3 201476
4 201574
5 201759
6 201649
7 200622
8 200112
9 201011
10 201210
11 20139
12 20165
13 19914

About Patrick Joost

Patrick Joost is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Dermatology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (172 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (112 citations), Cancer Research (72 citations), Physiology (22 citations) and Oncology (109 citations). Patrick Joost has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Axel Methner, Mef Nilbert, Christina Therkildsen, Mev Dominguez–Valentin, Mats Jönsson, Eva Rambech, Hans‐Jürgen Kreienkamp, Atanas Ignatov, Irm Hermans‐Borgmeyer and Heinz Schaller. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Urology, International Journal of Urology, Diagnostic Pathology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact