Diagnostic Pathology

2.4k papers and 36.8k indexed citations

About

The 2.4k papers published in Diagnostic Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 36.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Diagnostic Pathology usually cover Oncology (774 papers), Molecular Biology (614 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (580 papers) specifically the topics of Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (188 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (155 papers) and AI in cancer detection (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diagnostic Pathology are Janin Reifenrath, Anil V. Parwani, Yukako Yagi, Klaus Kayser, Marileila Varella‐Garcia, Oluwole Fadare, Henry B Armah, Jonathan I. Epstein, Jennifer Gordetsky and Liron Pantanowitz.

In The Last Decade

Diagnostic Pathology

2.2k papers receiving 36.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Diagnostic Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diagnostic Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diagnostic Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Diagnostic Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diagnostic Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diagnostic Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diagnostic Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026