Pam Smith

89 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Pam Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Research and Theory 314
  • Emergency Medical Services 356
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 53
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 207
  • General Health Professions 946
Replace Marie Hutchinson with:
Marie Hutchinson Australia
Judy Mannix Australia
Kerry Reid‐Searl Australia
Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia
Zane Robinson Wolf United States
William Lauder United Kingdom
Lorna Moxham Australia
Danielle D’Amour Canada
Malcolm Boyle Australia
Elizabeth Peter Canada
Pam Smith relative to Marie Hutchinson Australia Marie Hutchinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marie Hutchinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pam Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Smith. The network helps show where Pam Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pam Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pam Smith Line = papers co-authored together Pam Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992356
2 2012107
3 2013105
4 200072
5 201370
6 201268
7 201062
8 201858
9 200556
10 200753
11 200751
12 200351
13
The Emotional Labour of Nursing Revisited: Can Nurses Still Care?
201150
14 201345
15 201443
16 201343
17 198742
18 201038
19 202037
20 200534

About Pam Smith

Pam Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Research and Theory and Health Information Management, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (12 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (10 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (5 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (314 citations), Emergency Medical Services (356 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (53 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (207 citations) and General Health Professions (946 citations). Pam Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malawi and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Allan, Pauline Pearson, Alison Steven, Khim Horton, Katherine Curtis, Tonks N Fawcett, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari, Carin Magnusson, Maureen Mackintosh and Aziz Sheikh. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact