Pam Smith

3.4k citations
91 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Pam Smith

90 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Pam Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Research and Theory 250
  • Emergency Medical Services 286
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 32
  • General Health Professions 643
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 119
Replace Megan‐Jane Johnstone with:
Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia
Judy Mannix Australia
Lorna Moxham Australia
Zane Robinson Wolf United States
William Lauder United Kingdom
Sally Redfern United Kingdom
Elizabeth Peter Canada
Malcolm Boyle Australia
Maryann Alexander United States
Dianne Wynaden Australia
Pam Smith relative to Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia Megan‐Jane Johnstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Megan‐Jane Johnstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pam Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Smith. The network helps show where Pam Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pam Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pam Smith Line = papers co-authored together Pam Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992356
2 2012108
3 2013105
4 200072
5 201372
6 201268
7 201062
8 201858
9 200556
10 200754
11 200351
12 200751
13
The Emotional Labour of Nursing Revisited: Can Nurses Still Care?
201151
14 201445
15 201345
16 201344
17 198742
18 202041
19 201038
20 202036

About Pam Smith

Pam Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (12 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (250 citations), Emergency Medical Services (286 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (32 citations), General Health Professions (643 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (119 citations). Pam Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malawi and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen Allan, Pauline Pearson, Alison Steven, Katherine Curtis, Khim Horton, Tonks N Fawcett, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari, Carin Magnusson, Maureen Mackintosh and Aziz Sheikh. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact