Nusrat Farah

10 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Nusrat Farah
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • Clinical Psychology 88
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 29
  • Business and International Management 7
  • Accounting 27
Replace Paul G. Stoltz with:
Paul G. Stoltz United States
Elaine Conway United Kingdom
Sal Mistry United States
Olivier Mesly Canada
Fakhra Yasmin Czechia
Chiara Peroni South Africa
Vidya S. Athota Australia
Mengxi Yang China
Adnan Özyılmaz Türkiye
Mike Young United Kingdom
Nusrat Farah relative to Paul G. Stoltz United States Paul G. Stoltz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Paul G. Stoltz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nusrat Farah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nusrat Farah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nusrat Farah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nusrat Farah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nusrat Farah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nusrat Farah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nusrat Farah. The network helps show where Nusrat Farah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Nusrat Farah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nusrat Farah Line = papers co-authored together Nusrat Farah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 202167
2 201959
3 201853
4 202115
5 201712
6 202110
7
Impact of household and demographic characteristics on poverty in Bangladesh: A logistic regression analysis
20158
8 20173
9 20232
10 20232
11
How do Household Characteristics affect Children’s School Dropouts? Analysis of Survey Data from Bangladesh
20161
12 20230

About Nusrat Farah

Nusrat Farah is a scholar working on Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Neurology, Management Information Systems and Clinical Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (2 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (22 citations), Clinical Psychology (88 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (29 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations) and Accounting (27 citations). Nusrat Farah has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. Stafford, J. Michael Haynie, Charles Y. Murnieks, Melissa S. Cardon, Jonathan D. Arthurs, Jiyao Chen, Xue Wan, Allen Yin, Stephen X. Zhang and Rebecca Kechen Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Venturing, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Managerial Auditing Journal, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Accounting Horizons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact