Noah H. Silbert

54 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Noah H. Silbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 272
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 362
  • Sensory Systems 87
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 230
  • Linguistics and Language 67
Replace Michelle R. Molis with:
Michelle R. Molis United States
Susanne Brouwer Netherlands
Werner Deutsch Germany
Birgitta Sahlén Sweden
George Hollich United States
Varghese Peter Australia
Jacqueline Leybaert Belgium
S.G. Nooteboom Netherlands
Janne von Koss Torkildsen Norway
Ratree Wayland United States
Noah H. Silbert relative to Michelle R. Molis United States Michelle R. Molis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michelle R. Molis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noah H. Silbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah H. Silbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah H. Silbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah H. Silbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah H. Silbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah H. Silbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah H. Silbert. The network helps show where Noah H. Silbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah H. Silbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noah H. Silbert Line = papers co-authored together Noah H. Silbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019156
2 2013149
3 201361
4 201243
5 200834
6 201630
7 200929
8 201528
9 202127
10 201227
11 201524
12 201517
13 201816
14 200916
15 201215
16 202112
17 201711
18 202010
19 201810
20 20208

About Noah H. Silbert

Noah H. Silbert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Linguistics and Language, having authored 57 papers that have together received 828 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (22 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (13 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (12 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (10 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Language Development and Disorders (6 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers) and Blind Source Separation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (272 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (362 citations), Sensory Systems (87 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (230 citations) and Linguistics and Language (67 citations). Noah H. Silbert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Lina Motlagh Zadeh, David R. Moore, De Wet Swanepoel, Robin D. Thomas, Lisa L. Hunter, Mark VanDam, Meredith M. Hughes, Medha Tare, David Landy and Susan G. Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Language Learning, Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools and Ear and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact