Nicolas J. Schlienz

33 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

Nicolas J. Schlienz
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Pharmacology 565
  • Toxicology 78
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 129
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 69
Replace Susan J. Boyd with:
Susan J. Boyd United States
Dustin C. Lee United States
Pamela Sabioni Canada
Hollis C. Karoly United States
Mallory Loflin United States
Dino Zagic Australia
Kelly A. Sagar United States
Gráinne Schäfer United Kingdom
Cecilia L. Bergeria United States
Shanna Babalonis United States
Nicolas J. Schlienz relative to Susan J. Boyd United States Susan J. Boyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Susan J. Boyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas J. Schlienz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas J. Schlienz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas J. Schlienz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas J. Schlienz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas J. Schlienz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas J. Schlienz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas J. Schlienz. The network helps show where Nicolas J. Schlienz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolas J. Schlienz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolas J. Schlienz Line = papers co-authored together Nicolas J. Schlienz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018202
2 201886
3 202065
4 201763
5 202139
6 201139
7 201737
8 201837
9 201832
10 201231
11 201427
12 202026
13 201825
14 201423
15 201821
16 201718
17 201618
18 201317
19 201914
20 201814

About Nicolas J. Schlienz

Nicolas J. Schlienz is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 902 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (19 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (3 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (565 citations), Toxicology (78 citations), Applied Psychology (34 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (129 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (69 citations). Nicolas J. Schlienz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ryan G. Vandrey, George E. Bigelow, John M. Mitchell, Ronald Flegel, Edward J. Cone, Tory R. Spindle, Dustin C. Lee, Eugene D Hayes, Larry W. Hawk and Rebecca J. Houston. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Psychopharmacology and International Review of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact