John M. Mitchell
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.05%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Papers in
- Toxicology 32
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 32
- Pharmacology 14
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 14
- Co-authors
- Edward J. Cone (30 shared papers)Ronald R. Flegel (25 shared papers)Ryan G. Vandrey (14 shared papers)George E. Bigelow (14 shared papers)Charles LoDico (13 shared papers)Tory R. Spindle (9 shared papers)Evan Sullivan Herrmann (7 shared papers)Nicolas J. Schlienz (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology (33 papers)Drug and Alcohol Dependence (3 papers)Forensic Science International (3 papers)Clinical Chemistry (1 paper)JAMA Network Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John M. Mitchell
44 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Toxicology 924
- Pharmacology 820
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 59
- Pharmacology 55
- Physiology 118
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Mitchell. The network helps show where John M. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 216 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 177 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 154 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 100 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 96 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 75 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 72 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 68 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 57 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 49 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 48 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 36 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 35 |
About John M. Mitchell
John M. Mitchell is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (32 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (14 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (924 citations), Pharmacology (820 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (59 citations), Pharmacology (55 citations) and Physiology (118 citations). John M. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward J. Cone, Ronald R. Flegel, Ryan G. Vandrey, George E. Bigelow, Charles LoDico, Tory R. Spindle, Evan Sullivan Herrmann, Nicolas J. Schlienz, Eugene D Hayes and Marilyn Ann Huestis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Forensic Science International, Clinical Chemistry and JAMA Network Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.