Nick Campbell

4.9k citations
190 papers · 2.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Campbell

180 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Nick Campbell
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 941
  • Signal Processing 631
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.3k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 175
  • Parasitology 161
Replace James L. Morgan with:
James L. Morgan United States
Michael R. Brent United States
Ellen Douglas‐Cowie United Kingdom
Shravan Vasishth Germany
Alexander Klassmann Germany
Albert S. Bregman Canada
Mark Liberman United States
Pierre Delattre United States
Michel Treisman United Kingdom
Christopher T. Kello United States
Nick Campbell relative to James L. Morgan United States James L. Morgan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
James L. Morgan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Campbell. The network helps show where Nick Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Campbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Campbell Line = papers co-authored together Nick Campbell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 190 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003298
2 2000183
3 2001167
4 2017120
5 1995113
6 200394
7 201082
8 201372
9
DATABASES OF EMOTIONAL SPEECH
200052
10 200146
11
A Speech Synthesis System with Emotion for Assisting Communication
200045
12 201243
13 199839
14 200538
15 200435
16 201232
17 199331
18 201230
19
No laughing matter.
200529
20 200826

About Nick Campbell

Nick Campbell is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology and Signal Processing, having authored 190 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (72 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (44 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (30 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (24 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (23 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (19 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (16 papers) and Digital Communication and Language (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (941 citations), Signal Processing (631 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.3k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (175 citations) and Parasitology (161 citations). Nick Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Douglas‐Cowie, Roddy Cowie, Stephen C. Barker, Peter Roach, Renfu Shao, Alan W. Black, Carl Vogel, Stefan Scherer, Iacer Calixto and Michiaki Yasumura. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Reviews Genetics, Language Resources and Evaluation, Speech Communication, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Computer Speech & Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact