Computer Speech & Language

49.5k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 1986

Impact in

    • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques
    • Speech and dialogue systems
    • Topic Modeling
    • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
    • Speech and Audio Processing

Papers in

    • Speech Recognition and Synthesis 859
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 208
    • Speech and dialogue systems 160
    • Topic Modeling 117
    • Speech and Audio Processing 181

Computer Speech & Language

1.5k papers receiving 44.7k citations

Peers

Computer Speech & Language
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Artificial Intelligence 34.6k
  • Signal Processing 5.3k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.2k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 689
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2k
Replace IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing with:
IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing United States
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research United States
Speech Communication United States
Artificial Intelligence Review China
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing China
International Journal of Speech Technology India
Cognitive Computation China
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing China
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology China
Computer Speech & Language relative to IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing United States IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Computer Speech & Language

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Speech & Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Speech & Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Speech & Language more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Computer Speech & Language

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Speech & Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Speech & Language.

About Computer Speech & Language

The 1.6k papers published in Computer Speech & Language in the last decades have received a total of 49.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Computer Speech & Language usually cover Artificial Intelligence (1.3k papers), Signal Processing (196 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (136 papers), Physiology (60 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (29 papers) specifically the topics of Speech Recognition and Synthesis (859 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (208 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (181 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (160 papers), Topic Modeling (117 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (68 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (65 papers) and Voice and Speech Disorders (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Speech & Language are Mark Gales, Philip C. Woodland, S.J. Young, Joshua Goodman, C.J. Leggetter, Stanley F. Chen, Roni Rosenfeld, Holger Schwenk, Martin P. Cooke and S. Levinson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact