Céline De Looze

67 papers receiving 752 citations

Peers

Céline De Looze
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 205
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 27
  • Linguistics and Language 36
  • Language and Linguistics 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 111
Replace Jack Nissan with:
Jack Nissan United Kingdom
Evelyn Shatil Israel
Steve Parker United States
Tiffany C. Sandoval United States
Edwin M.‐L. Yiu Hong Kong
Eleonora Catricalà Italy
Kirsty Harkness United Kingdom
Karin Zazo Ortiz Brazil
Juan José García Meilán Spain
Jeffrey L. Danhauer United States
Céline De Looze relative to Jack Nissan United Kingdom Jack Nissan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Jack Nissan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Céline De Looze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Céline De Looze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline De Looze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline De Looze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Céline De Looze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline De Looze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline De Looze. The network helps show where Céline De Looze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Céline De Looze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Céline De Looze Line = papers co-authored together Céline De Looze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201380
2 202156
3 202147
4 202139
5 201737
6 201834
7 201127
8 201726
9 201823
10 202219
11 202017
12 202217
13 200916
14 202115
15 202115
16 201314
17 202314
18 202213
19 202013
20 201113

About Céline De Looze

Céline De Looze is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 797 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (14 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (4 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (205 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (27 citations), Linguistics and Language (36 citations), Language and Linguistics (75 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations). Céline De Looze has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rose Anne Kenny, Nick Campbell, Brian Vaughan, Silvin P. Knight, Stefan Scherer, Daniel Hirst, M.D. Ward, Richard B. Reilly, Stéphane Rauzy and Robert Briggs. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Neurobiology of Aging, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact