Anna Esposito

183 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Anna Esposito
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 616
  • Human-Computer Interaction 199
  • Signal Processing 337
  • Linguistics and Language 106
  • Artificial Intelligence 724
Replace Roger K. Moore with:
Roger K. Moore United Kingdom
Elizabeth Shriberg United States
Richard Shillcock United Kingdom
Sally Andrews Australia
Michael Wagner Australia
Johannes Wagner Germany
Robert M. French France
Shrikanth Narayanan United States
Alice F. Healy United States
Max M. Louwerse United States
Anna Esposito relative to Roger K. Moore United Kingdom Roger K. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Roger K. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Esposito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Esposito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Esposito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Esposito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Esposito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Esposito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Esposito. The network helps show where Anna Esposito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Esposito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Esposito Line = papers co-authored together Anna Esposito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 207 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199990
2 201082
3 201767
4 201663
5 201562
6 199660
7 201955
8 201550
9 200049
10 200249
11 200243
12 201243
13 200540
14 202139
15 201538
16 201937
17 200537
18 200936
19 202133
20
Nonlinear speech processing: Overview and applications
200232

About Anna Esposito

Anna Esposito is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Signal Processing, having authored 207 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotion and Mood Recognition (31 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (19 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (19 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (19 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (15 papers), AI in Service Interactions (12 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (11 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (616 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (199 citations), Signal Processing (337 citations), Linguistics and Language (106 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (724 citations). Anna Esposito has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Marcos Faúndez-Zanuy, Gennaro Cordasco, Carl Vogel, Francesco Carlo Morabito, Alessandro Vinciarelli, Eros Pasero, Maria‐Gabriella Di Benedetto, M. Marinaro, Antonietta M. Esposito and Nikolaos Bourbakis. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Computation, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, International Journal of Neural Systems, IEEE Access and Neural Networks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact