Nicholas Freestone

18 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Nicholas Freestone
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Equine 12
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 119
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 67
  • Molecular Biology 165
  • Physiology 55
Replace Robert E. Garfield with:
Robert E. Garfield United States
Iris A. Horst United States
Emma J. Agnew United Kingdom
Meizhi Li China
Bridget M. Seitz United States
Moran Sagiv Israel
Kirk W. Evanson United States
Jessica Daolio Italy
David Strich Israel
Etoi Garrison United States
Nicholas Freestone relative to Robert E. Garfield United States Robert E. Garfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Robert E. Garfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Freestone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Freestone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Freestone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Freestone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Freestone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Freestone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Freestone. The network helps show where Nicholas Freestone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Freestone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Freestone Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Freestone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1996105
2 199953
3 200137
4 200025
5 199924
6
The effects of oxytocin and progestagens on myometrial contractility in vitro during equine pregnancy.
200021
7 202214
8 201712
9 200912
10 200112
11 201911
12 19969
13 20016
14 19964
15 19942
16 20172
17 19961
18 20251
19 20250

About Nicholas Freestone

Nicholas Freestone is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Equine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (12 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (119 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (67 citations), Molecular Biology (165 citations) and Physiology (55 citations). Nicholas Freestone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Samo Ribarič, William T. Mason, Alberto Julio Kaumann, Peter C. M. Molenaar, Doreen Sarsero, Roland Vetter, Thomas Langenickel, Michaela Scheuermann‐Freestone, Roland Willenbrock and Rainer Dietz. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Biochemical Journal, British Journal of Educational Technology, British Journal of Pharmacology and Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact