Nicholas Freestone

424 citations
16 papers · 320 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Freestone

15 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Nicholas Freestone
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Equine 12
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 123
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 60
  • Molecular Biology 177
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 40
Replace Chihiro Kojima with:
Chihiro Kojima Japan
I M Colin Belgium
Xiaoliang Qiu United States
Elisa Bouillet Switzerland
В. А. Рогозкин Russia
Joel Temple United States
W. Reid Bolus United States
D. G. Szabó Hungary
Mirta Gryngarten Argentina
Giuseppina Iannelli Italy
Nicholas Freestone relative to Chihiro Kojima Japan Chihiro Kojima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Chihiro Kojima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Freestone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Freestone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Freestone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Freestone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Freestone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Freestone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Freestone. The network helps show where Nicholas Freestone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Freestone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Freestone Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Freestone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 199698
2 199951
3 200133
4 200023
5 199923
6
The effects of oxytocin and progestagens on myometrial contractility in vitro during equine pregnancy.
200020
7 200912
8 202211
9 200111
10 201711
11 19969
12 20199
13 20015
14 19942
15 20172
16 20250

About Nicholas Freestone

Nicholas Freestone is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Immunology and Education, having authored 16 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (12 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (123 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (60 citations), Molecular Biology (177 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (40 citations). Nicholas Freestone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Samo Ribarič, William T. Mason, Alberto J. Kaumann, Doreen Sarsero, Peter Molenaar, Roland Willenbrock, Roland Vetter, Thomas Langenickel, Michaela Scheuermann‐Freestone and Rainer Dietz. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Journal, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, British Journal of Educational Technology and Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact