Neil Sinclair
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Free Will and Agency
Papers in
- Philosophy 22
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 18
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
-
- Free Will and Agency 10
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 9
- Co-authors
- Jon Robson (1 shared paper)Jeffrey O. Segrave (1 shared paper)Simon Blackburn (1 shared paper)Dávid Vogel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (3 papers)Analysis (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Analytic Philosophy (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
Neil Sinclair
25 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Philosophy 137
- Cognitive Neuroscience 84
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
- General Health Professions 29
- History and Philosophy of Science 5
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Sinclair
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Sinclair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Sinclair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Sinclair more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Sinclair
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Sinclair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Sinclair. The network helps show where Neil Sinclair may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Neil Sinclair, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 2 |
About Neil Sinclair
Neil Sinclair is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 154 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (18 papers), Free Will and Agency (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers) and Law, logistics, and international trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (137 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (33 citations), General Health Professions (29 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations). Neil Sinclair has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Jon Robson, Jeffrey O. Segrave, Simon Blackburn and Dávid Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Analysis, Philosophical Studies, Analytic Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.