Peter A. Graham
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Papers in
-
- Free Will and Agency 6
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 1
-
- War, Ethics, and Justification 6
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- Co-authors
- Noël Burch (1 shared paper)Dana Kay Nelkin (1 shared paper)Joshua D. Greene (1 shared paper)Liezl van Zyl (1 shared paper)Guy Kahane (1 shared paper)Sven Nyholm (1 shared paper)F. M. Kamm (1 shared paper)Natalie Gold (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Moral Philosophy (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)Ethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter A. Graham
9 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Philosophy 210
- Cognitive Neuroscience 226
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
- General Decision Sciences 3
- Political Science and International Relations 41
Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. Graham
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. Graham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. Graham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. Graham. The network helps show where Peter A. Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter A. Graham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 117 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 2 |
About Peter A. Graham
Peter A. Graham is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (6 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Ethics in medical practice (1 paper), Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (210 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (226 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (33 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (41 citations). Peter A. Graham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Noël Burch, Dana Kay Nelkin, Joshua D. Greene, Liezl van Zyl, Guy Kahane, Sven Nyholm, F. M. Kamm, Natalie Gold, Hallvard Lillehammer and Fiona Woollard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Moral Philosophy, The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.