Peter A. Graham
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Papers in
-
- Free Will and Agency 6
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 1
-
- War, Ethics, and Justification 6
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- Co-authors
- Noël Burch (1 shared paper)F. M. Kamm (1 shared paper)Hallvard Lillehammer (1 shared paper)Natalie Gold (1 shared paper)Sven Nyholm (1 shared paper)W. J. Fitzpatrick (1 shared paper)Dana Kay Nelkin (1 shared paper)Ezio Di Nucci (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)Journal of Moral Philosophy (1 paper)Ethics (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter A. Graham
9 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Philosophy 163
- Cognitive Neuroscience 168
- General Decision Sciences 3
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 21
- Political Science and International Relations 25
Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. Graham
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. Graham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. Graham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. Graham. The network helps show where Peter A. Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter A. Graham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 2 |
About Peter A. Graham
Peter A. Graham is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (6 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (1 paper), Ethics in medical practice (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (163 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (168 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (21 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (25 citations). Peter A. Graham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Noël Burch, F. M. Kamm, Hallvard Lillehammer, Natalie Gold, Sven Nyholm, W. J. Fitzpatrick, Dana Kay Nelkin, Ezio Di Nucci, Liezl van Zyl and Guy Kahane. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of Moral Philosophy, Ethics and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.