Daniel Star

479 citations
18 papers · 251 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Free Will and Agency
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Papers in

    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 12
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 7
    • Indian and Buddhist Studies 3

Daniel Star

16 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Daniel Star
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Philosophy 200
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 135
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
  • History and Philosophy of Science 10
  • General Health Professions 34
Replace Mark van Roojen with:
Mark van Roojen United States
Tomás Bogardus United States
Neil Sinclair United Kingdom
G. F. Schueler United States
Peter A. Graham United States
Julia Markovits United States
Matthew S. Bedke Canada
Michael Pace United States
Katia Vavova United States
Jussi Suikkanen United Kingdom
Daniel Star relative to Mark van Roojen United States Mark van Roojen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mark van Roojen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Star

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Star's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Star with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Star more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Star

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Star. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Star. The network helps show where Daniel Star may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Star, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Star Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Star links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200867
2 200957
3 200245
4 201318
5 201517
6 20119
7
Knowing Better: Virtue, Deliberation, and Normative Ethics
20158
8 20088
9 20136
10 20154
11 20163
12 20113
13 20022
14 20112
15 20181
16 20021
17 20150
18 20240

About Daniel Star

Daniel Star is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (3 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (200 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (135 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations) and General Health Professions (34 citations). Daniel Star has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Kearns and Candice Delmas. Their work appears in journals such as Hypatia, Ethics, Journal of Moral Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact