Daniel Star

445 citations
16 papers · 215 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Free Will and Agency
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Papers in

Daniel Star

14 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers

Daniel Star
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Philosophy 175
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
  • Political Science and International Relations 25
Replace Pekka Väyrynen with:
Pekka Väyrynen United Kingdom
Philip Stratton‐Lake United Kingdom
Sergio Tenenbaum Canada
Tomás Bogardus United States
Edward S. Hinchman United States
Julia Markovits United States
Andrew Reisner Canada
E. J. Coffman United States
Bart Streumer Netherlands
François Schroeter Australia
Daniel Star relative to Pekka Väyrynen United Kingdom Pekka Väyrynen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pekka Väyrynen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Star

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Star's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Star with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Star more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Star

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Star. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Star. The network helps show where Daniel Star may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Star, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Star Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Star links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200860
2 200952
3 200230
4 201316
5 201515
6 20119
7 20088
8 20156
9 20136
10 20113
11 20163
12 20112
13 20022
14 20181
15 20021
16 20161

About Daniel Star

Daniel Star is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (3 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (175 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (25 citations). Daniel Star has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Kearns and Candice Delmas. Their work appears in journals such as Hypatia, Ethics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of Moral Philosophy and Ratio.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact