Julia Markovits

548 citations
6 papers · 203 · h-index 3

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • War, Ethics, and Justification
    • Free Will and Agency
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Papers in

    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 6
    • War, Ethics, and Justification 2
    • Free Will and Agency 3
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
Journals
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)Australasian Philosophical Review (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

Julia Markovits

6 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

Julia Markovits
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Philosophy 172
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
  • General Health Professions 33
  • History and Philosophy of Science 5
Replace Peter A. Graham with:
Peter A. Graham United States
Caj Strandberg Sweden
Folke Tersman Sweden
Philip Stratton‐Lake United Kingdom
Pekka Väyrynen United Kingdom
Edward S. Hinchman United States
Paul Russell Canada
Jussi Suikkanen United Kingdom
Neil Sinclair United Kingdom
Daniel Star United States
Julia Markovits relative to Peter A. Graham United States Peter A. Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Peter A. Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Markovits

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Markovits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Markovits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Markovits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Markovits

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Markovits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Markovits. The network helps show where Julia Markovits may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2010114
2 201454
3 201231
4 20162
5 20201
6 20161

About Julia Markovits

Julia Markovits is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (172 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (34 citations), General Health Professions (33 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations). Julia Markovits has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review, Oxford University Press eBooks and Australasian Philosophical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact