Neil Hunt

4.3k citations
84 papers · 2.2k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Neil Hunt

81 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Neil Hunt
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Toxicology 156
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 375
  • Biological Psychiatry 58
  • Epidemiology 715
  • Clinical Psychology 299
Replace Flávio Pechansky with:
Flávio Pechansky Brazil
Russell C. Callaghan Canada
Steve Allsop Australia
Jane Carlisle Maxwell United States
Abhishek Ghosh India
Alexander Pabst Germany
Margriet van Laar Netherlands
Daniela Piontek Germany
Catalina Lopez‐Quintero United States
Jonathan Foulds United States
Neil Hunt relative to Flávio Pechansky Brazil Flávio Pechansky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Flávio Pechansky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Hunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Hunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Hunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Hunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Hunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Hunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Hunt. The network helps show where Neil Hunt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Hunt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Hunt Line = papers co-authored together Neil Hunt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201697
2 200692
3 199279
4 199879
5 200578
6 200677
7 199574
8 199959
9 200059
10 199556
11 200655
12 200454
13 200452
14 200651
15 201148
16 199547
17 200646
18 199444
19 201441
20 200640

About Neil Hunt

Neil Hunt is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (15 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (13 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (12 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (10 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (4 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (156 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (375 citations), Biological Psychiatry (58 citations), Epidemiology (715 citations) and Clinical Psychology (299 citations). Neil Hunt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Trevor Silverstone, Alex Stevens, Luke Mitcheson, Jim McCambridge, Adam Winstock, Paul Griffiths, Garry Stillwell, Colin Taylor, David Castle and Michael Gill. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Drug Policy, Addiction, European Addiction Research, Harm Reduction Journal and Psychiatric Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact