Daniela Piontek

2.4k citations
95 papers · 1.8k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Piontek

90 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Daniela Piontek
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Epidemiology 628
  • Pharmacology 322
  • Applied Psychology 89
  • Toxicology 59
  • Clinical Psychology 349
Replace Jacek Moskalewicz with:
Jacek Moskalewicz Poland
Meenakshi S. Subbaraman United States
Carolin Kilian Germany
Celia Taylor United Kingdom
Robin Room Australia
Björn Hibell Sweden
Cynthia K. Suerken United States
Annabel Boys United Kingdom
Marissa B. Esser United States
Salme Ahlström Finland
Daniela Piontek relative to Jacek Moskalewicz Poland Jacek Moskalewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Jacek Moskalewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Piontek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Piontek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Piontek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Piontek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Piontek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Piontek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Piontek. The network helps show where Daniela Piontek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Piontek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Piontek Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Piontek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013119
2 2010100
3 200884
4 201568
5 201460
6 201354
7 201254
8 201052
9 201152
10 201051
11 201649
12 200745
13 201044
14 201340
15 201337
16 201234
17 201532
18 200731
19 201030
20 201430

About Daniela Piontek

Daniela Piontek is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Physiology, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (41 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (17 papers), Health and Medical Studies (12 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (9 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (628 citations), Pharmacology (322 citations), Applied Psychology (89 citations), Toxicology (59 citations) and Clinical Psychology (349 citations). Daniela Piontek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Ludwig Kraus, Alexander Pabst, Elena Gomes de Matos, Stéphane Legleye, Josefine Atzendorf, Gerhard Bühringer, Sebastian E. Baumeister, Stefanie Mueller, Myriam Khlat and Fred C. Pampel. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, European Addiction Research, Alcohol and Alcoholism, Drug and Alcohol Review and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact