Daniela Piontek
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Papers in
- Epidemiology 51
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 49
-
- Health and Medical Studies 16
- Homelessness and Social Issues 14
- Co-authors
- Ludwig Kraus (70 shared papers)Alexander Pabst (23 shared papers)Elena Gomes de Matos (20 shared papers)Stéphane Legleye (9 shared papers)Josefine Atzendorf (9 shared papers)Gerhard Bühringer (8 shared papers)Sebastian E. Baumeister (3 shared papers)Stefanie Mueller (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Daniela Piontek
89 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Applied Psychology 146
- Pharmacology 384
- Epidemiology 779
- General Health Professions 520
- Toxicology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Piontek
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Piontek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Piontek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Piontek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Piontek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Piontek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Piontek. The network helps show where Daniela Piontek may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Piontek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 27 |
About Daniela Piontek
Daniela Piontek is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Physiology, Clinical Psychology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (49 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (24 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (17 papers), Health and Medical Studies (16 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (146 citations), Pharmacology (384 citations), Epidemiology (779 citations), General Health Professions (520 citations) and Toxicology (68 citations). Daniela Piontek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Ludwig Kraus, Alexander Pabst, Elena Gomes de Matos, Stéphane Legleye, Josefine Atzendorf, Gerhard Bühringer, Sebastian E. Baumeister, Stefanie Mueller, Fred C. Pampel and Myriam Khlat. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, European Addiction Research, Alcohol and Alcoholism, Drug and Alcohol Review and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.