Countries where authors publish in Harm Reduction Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Harm Reduction Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Harm Reduction Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harm Reduction Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Harm Reduction Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Harm Reduction Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Harm Reduction Journal.
About Harm Reduction Journal
The 1.6k papers published in Harm Reduction Journal in the last decades have received a total of 31.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Harm Reduction Journal usually cover Epidemiology (626 papers), Toxicology (58 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (271 papers), Hepatology (55 papers) and Pharmacology (83 papers) specifically the topics of HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (575 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (264 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (118 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (84 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (80 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (65 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (58 papers) and Hepatitis C virus research (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Harm Reduction Journal are Thomas H Kerr, Ernest Drucker, Evan Wood, Amanda Reiman, Philippe Lucas, Brad Rodu, Jane A. Buxton, Don C. Des Jarlais, Suzan M. Walters and Magdalena Harris.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.