Nathaniel Smith
Impact in
- Family Practice top 2%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 3
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 1
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 2
- Co-authors
- Michael C. Peterson (2 shared papers)Larry V. Staker (2 shared papers)John Holbrook (1 shared paper)Vivek Pawar (1 shared paper)Dennis Meletiche (1 shared paper)Rachel Beckerman (1 shared paper)Yushan Jiang (1 shared paper)Amy Phillips (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (1 paper)Neurology (1 paper)Journal of Medical Economics (1 paper)Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy (2 papers)The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel Smith
8 papers receiving 477 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Family Practice 101
- Health Informatics 11
- General Health Professions 109
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 122
- Psychiatry and Mental health 62
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Smith. The network helps show where Nathaniel Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 288 | |
| 2 | Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. | 1992 | 181 |
| 3 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 9 | Occupational therapy in a pediatric section. | 2000 | 1 |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 0 |
About Nathaniel Smith
Nathaniel Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (101 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), General Health Professions (109 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (122 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (62 citations). Nathaniel Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Peterson, Larry V. Staker, John Holbrook, Vivek Pawar, Dennis Meletiche, Rachel Beckerman, Yushan Jiang, Amy Phillips and Julie Locklear. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Neurology, Journal of Medical Economics, Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy and The Journal for Specialists in Group Work.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.