Kees van den Berge
Impact in
- Family Practice top 0.2%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Informatics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 7
-
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors 1
- Co-authors
- Silvia Mamede (9 shared papers)Tamara van Gog (8 shared papers)Henk G. Schmidt (6 shared papers)Jan L.C.M. van Saase (5 shared papers)Remy M. J. P. Rikers (5 shared papers)Coen van Guldener (2 shared papers)Herman J. Bueving (2 shared papers)Tim van der Zee (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Academic Medicine (2 papers)BMJ Quality & Safety (2 papers)Teaching and Learning in Medicine (1 paper)JAMA (1 paper)European Journal of Internal Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Kees van den Berge
10 papers receiving 627 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Family Practice 424
- Health Informatics 19
- Emergency Medical Services 70
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 177
- Pharmacy 29
Countries citing papers authored by Kees van den Berge
This map shows the geographic impact of Kees van den Berge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees van den Berge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees van den Berge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kees van den Berge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees van den Berge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees van den Berge. The network helps show where Kees van den Berge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Kees van den Berge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 291 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 10 | A postoperative puzzle. | 2011 | 1 |
About Kees van den Berge
Kees van den Berge is a scholar working on Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers), Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (424 citations), Health Informatics (19 citations), Emergency Medical Services (70 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (177 citations) and Pharmacy (29 citations). Kees van den Berge has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Mamede, Tamara van Gog, Henk G. Schmidt, Jan L.C.M. van Saase, Remy M. J. P. Rikers, Coen van Guldener, Herman J. Bueving, Tim van der Zee, Paul L. A. van Daele and Walter W. van den Broek. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, BMJ Quality & Safety, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, JAMA and European Journal of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.