Nathan P. Smith
Impact in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant and animal studies
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 6
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 6
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology 1
-
- Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions 4
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 1
- Co-authors
- Scott A. Mori (5 shared papers)Wayne Law (1 shared paper)Lawrence M. Kelly (1 shared paper)Ghillean Τ. Prance (1 shared paper)Ya‐Yi Huang (1 shared paper)Michael John Gilbert Hopkins (1 shared paper)Oscar M. Vargas (1 shared paper)Alexander Steiner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society (1 paper)European Journal of Public Health (1 paper)Phytotaxa (1 paper)Kew Bulletin (2 papers)Harvard Papers in Botany (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Nathan P. Smith
6 papers receiving 30 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 23
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 11
- Developmental Biology 1
- Global and Planetary Change 5
- Ecological Modeling 1
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan P. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan P. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan P. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan P. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan P. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan P. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan P. Smith. The network helps show where Nathan P. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Nathan P. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 3 | The utility of placentation in the circumscription of genera of new world Lecythidaceae (Brazil nut family) | 2015 | 4 |
| 4 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 0 |
About Nathan P. Smith
Nathan P. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Marketing and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 7 papers that have together received 31 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (1 paper), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (1 paper), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (1 paper) and Service and Product Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (23 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (11 citations), Developmental Biology (1 citation), Global and Planetary Change (5 citations) and Ecological Modeling (1 citation). Nathan P. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Scott A. Mori, Wayne Law, Lawrence M. Kelly, Ghillean Τ. Prance, Ya‐Yi Huang, Michael John Gilbert Hopkins, Oscar M. Vargas, Alexander Steiner, Sébastien Chastin and Alberto Vicentini. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, European Journal of Public Health, Phytotaxa, Kew Bulletin and Harvard Papers in Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.