Harvard Papers in Botany

454 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 454 papers published in Harvard Papers in Botany in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Harvard Papers in Botany usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (414 papers), Plant Science (250 papers) and Molecular Biology (213 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (223 papers), Plant and animal studies (214 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (195 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Harvard Papers in Botany are Ihsan A. Al‐Shehbaz, Jason R. Grant, Paul Ormerod, Xavier Cornejo, Carlyle A. Luer, Jianhua Li, Hugh H. Iltis, George W. Argus, Franco Pupulin and Michael D. Windham.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Harvard Papers in Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Harvard Papers in Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Harvard Papers in Botany.

Countries where authors publish in Harvard Papers in Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Harvard Papers in Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Harvard Papers in Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvard Papers in Botany more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025