Christopher W. Dick

117 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Christopher W. Dick
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.8k
  • Ecological Modeling 589
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.6k
  • Horticulture 94
  • Genetics 1.8k
Replace William J. Baker with:
William J. Baker United Kingdom
Colin E. Hughes United Kingdom
Scott E. Miller United States
Justin Moat United Kingdom
Charles H. Cannon United States
Nalini M. Nadkarni United States
Alexandre Camargo Martensen Brazil
Emilio M. Bruna United States
José Maria Cardoso da Silva Brazil
José Sarukhán Mexico
Christopher W. Dick relative to William J. Baker United Kingdom William J. Baker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
William J. Baker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher W. Dick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher W. Dick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher W. Dick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher W. Dick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher W. Dick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher W. Dick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher W. Dick. The network helps show where Christopher W. Dick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher W. Dick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher W. Dick Line = papers co-authored together Christopher W. Dick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003293
2 2004269
3 2008255
4 2017241
5 2008235
6 2004231
7 2005223
8 2001220
9 2004208
10 2004193
11 2007115
12 2004113
13 2007110
14 2009103
15 2003101
16 200498
17 200993
18 201082
19 200579
20 201479

About Christopher W. Dick

Christopher W. Dick is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 118 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (45 papers), Plant and animal studies (43 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (21 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (15 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (11 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (589 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.6k citations), Horticulture (94 citations) and Genetics (1.8k citations). Christopher W. Dick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Panama and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Eldredge Bermingham, Rémy J. Petit, Frédéric Austerlitz, Andrew K. Jorgenson, R. Toby Pennington, Lúcia G. Lohmann, Alison G. Nazareno, Jordan B. Bemmels, Rogério Gribel and Feng Sheng Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biogeography, Molecular Ecology, Biotropica, Applications in Plant Sciences and Molecular Ecology Resources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact