Nathan Hodson

37 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Nathan Hodson
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Family Practice 10
  • Reproductive Medicine 38
  • Applied Psychology 12
  • Research and Theory 2
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 6
Replace Jennifer Edgoose with:
Jennifer Edgoose United States
Nicole Jacobs United States
Stamatis Papaharitou Greece
Xiaofei Kang China
Samantha Murphy United Kingdom
Shireen Shehzad Bhamani Pakistan
Mikayla Hyman United States
Kate Obst Australia
Gaia Polloni Italy
Danielle Hassoun France
Nathan Hodson relative to Jennifer Edgoose United States Jennifer Edgoose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Jennifer Edgoose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Hodson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Hodson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Hodson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Hodson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Hodson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Hodson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Hodson. The network helps show where Nathan Hodson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Hodson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Hodson Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Hodson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202051
2 202025
3 202417
4 202415
5 201912
6 201910
7 20198
8 20208
9 20247
10 20227
11 20227
12 20206
13 20245
14 20205
15 20165
16 20224
17 20244
18 20233
19 20193
20 20183

About Nathan Hodson

Nathan Hodson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Challenges (3 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (10 citations), Reproductive Medicine (38 citations), Applied Psychology (12 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (6 citations). Nathan Hodson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jordan A. Parsons, Susan Bewley, Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Peter Woods, Byron J. Powell, Brian D. Earp, Rinad S. Beidas, Per Nilsén, Domenico Giacco and Max Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Nursing Ethics, Medical Education, British Journal of General Practice and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact