Michael Sobolev

534 citations
32 papers · 269 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Sobolev

28 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Michael Sobolev
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Applied Psychology 103
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
  • Information Systems and Management 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 94
Replace Charlie Hargood with:
Charlie Hargood United Kingdom
Aaron Springer United States
Honglu Du United States
Marcia Nißen Switzerland
Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky United States
Ifeoma Adaji Canada
Aleksandar Matic Spain
Wilken Wehrt Germany
Stefán Ólafsson United States
Frode Guribye Norway
Michael Sobolev relative to Charlie Hargood United Kingdom Charlie Hargood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Charlie Hargood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Sobolev

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Sobolev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Sobolev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Sobolev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Sobolev

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Sobolev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Sobolev. The network helps show where Michael Sobolev may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Sobolev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Sobolev Line = papers co-authored together Michael Sobolev links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201880
2 202119
3 201818
4 201817
5 202115
6 202014
7 201911
8 202210
9 201810
10 20229
11 20229
12 20218
13 20207
14 20246
15 20226
16 20235
17 20214
18 20194
19 20243
20 20213

About Michael Sobolev

Michael Sobolev is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 32 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (15 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers) and Recommender Systems and Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (103 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations), Information Systems and Management (38 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (30 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (94 citations). Michael Sobolev has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Estrin, Nicola Dell, Longqi Yang, John M. Kane, Hongyi Wen, Laura Zimmermann, Inbal Nahum‐Shani, Frederick Muench, Lisa K. Militello and Daniel A. Adler. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Mental Health, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Scientific Reports and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact