Natasha Michael

44 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers

Natasha Michael
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 486
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 67
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 239
  • Clinical Psychology 231
Replace David Kuhl with:
David Kuhl Canada
Simon Wein Israel
Rinat Nissim Canada
Alicia Krikorian Colombia
Michelle B. Riba United States
Fiona O’Shea Canada
Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard Denmark
Sheila Lander Canada
Susan Burney Australia
Alison M. Rhodes United States
Natasha Michael relative to David Kuhl Canada David Kuhl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
David Kuhl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Michael

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Michael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Michael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Michael more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Michael

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Michael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Michael. The network helps show where Natasha Michael may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Michael, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Michael Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Michael links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201796
2 201693
3 201683
4 201364
5 201940
6 201340
7 201532
8 201931
9 201330
10 202228
11 201527
12 201327
13 201624
14 201724
15 201924
16 202218
17 202218
18 201916
19 202116
20 201915

About Natasha Michael

Natasha Michael is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 900 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (31 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (13 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (10 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (486 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (67 citations), Applied Psychology (63 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (239 citations) and Clinical Psychology (231 citations). Natasha Michael has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David W. Kissane, Joanne Brooker, Josephine M. Clayton, Clare O’Callaghan, Merlina Sulistio, Clare O’Callaghan, Courtney Hempton, Michael Franco, Susan Burney and David M. Clarke. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, BMC Palliative Care, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Palliative & Supportive Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact