Daniel Costa

562 citations
37 papers · 399 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Costa

30 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Daniel Costa
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 170
  • Ophthalmology 54
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 95
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 75
  • Small Animals 18
Replace Fulvio Costantinides with:
Fulvio Costantinides Italy
Elif Erdem Türkiye
Nilva Simeren Bueno de Moraes Brazil
Jyotirmoy Biswas India
Yann Delannoy France
Matthew S. Cannon United States
Khalid F. Tabbara Saudi Arabia
Aashish K. Bansal India
Timothy W. Floyd United States
Nadir Ali Pakistan
Daniel Costa relative to Fulvio Costantinides Italy Fulvio Costantinides's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Fulvio Costantinides · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Costa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Costa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Costa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Costa. The network helps show where Daniel Costa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Costa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Costa Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Costa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201783
2 201652
3 201436
4 201333
5 201933
6 201524
7 201421
8 201519
9 201313
10 20167
11 20177
12 20147
13 20197
14 20157
15 20176
16 20156
17 20185
18 20185
19 20175
20 20084

About Daniel Costa

Daniel Costa is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Speech and Hearing, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (7 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers) and Health Education and Validation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (170 citations), Ophthalmology (54 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (95 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (75 citations) and Small Animals (18 citations). Daniel Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Marta Leiva, Jose R. Rivas Rios, Fernando Laguna, Maria Teresa Peña, Kerry Anne Sherman, Alberto Diaz de Leon, Louise E. Heiniger, Laura-Kate E. Shaw, Iván Pedrosa and Fernando Uliana Kay. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Ophthalmology, The Journal of Urology, Veterinary Record, Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact