Jane Phillips

306 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Peers

Jane Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 357
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 239
  • Research and Theory 57
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.8k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 252
Replace Patsy Yates with:
Patsy Yates Australia
Ingalill Rahm Hallberg Sweden
Christopher J. Burant United States
Marlene Z. Cohen United States
Bengt Fridlund Sweden
Ruth McCorkle United States
Davina Porock United States
Christine K. Cassel United States
Margaret B. Harrison Canada
Barbara Given United States
Jane Phillips relative to Patsy Yates Australia Patsy Yates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Patsy Yates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Phillips. The network helps show where Jane Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Jane Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 320 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007327
2 2012200
3 2015194
4 2010166
5 2014138
6 2006137
7 2020102
8 201996
9 201693
10 202193
11 201688
12 199784
13 201984
14 200984
15 200674
16 201571
17 201468
18 201766
19 202065
20 200761

About Jane Phillips

Jane Phillips is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Oncology, Clinical Psychology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 320 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (66 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (18 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (15 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (14 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (14 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (12 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (11 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (357 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (239 citations), Research and Theory (57 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.8k citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (252 citations). Jane Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia M. Davidson, Tim Luckett, Meera Agar, David C. Currow, Michelle DiGiacomo, Louise Hickman, Claudia Virdun, Elizabeth Halcomb, Priyanka Bhattarai and Phillip J. Newton. Their work appears in journals such as Palliative Medicine, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Palliative Medicine and BMC Palliative Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact