Natalie Thomas

41 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Natalie Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 102
  • Biological Psychiatry 53
  • Microbiology 101
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 160
  • Clinical Psychology 201
Replace Jakob Grove with:
Jakob Grove Denmark
Jiansong Zhou China
Indrani Halder United States
Haroon Sheikh Canada
Kathleen M. Gorman Ireland
W.M.A. Verhoeven Netherlands
Ying Jiang China
Jennifer L. Phillips Canada
Luis I. García Mexico
Jason J. Paris United States
Natalie Thomas relative to Jakob Grove Denmark Jakob Grove's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jakob Grove · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Thomas. The network helps show where Natalie Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019198
2 2020166
3 2018100
4 202095
5 201785
6 202242
7 201641
8 202035
9 201835
10 202035
11 201831
12 201825
13 201825
14 201925
15 201021
16 201520
17 202119
18 202219
19 202118
20 201818

About Natalie Thomas

Natalie Thomas is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (12 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (10 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (5 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (4 papers), Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (3 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (102 citations), Biological Psychiatry (53 citations), Microbiology (101 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (160 citations) and Clinical Psychology (201 citations). Natalie Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Gurvich, Jayashri Kulkarni, Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib, Denise J. Roe, Paweł Łaniewski, Zehra Esra Ilhan, Dana M. Chase, Melissa M. Herbst‐Kralovetz, Roisin Worsley and Kate E. Hoy. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Journal of Translational Medicine and Vitamins and hormones.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact