Gemma Sharp

2.3k citations
71 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Gemma Sharp

68 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Gemma Sharp
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Clinical Psychology 617
  • Applied Psychology 81
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 438
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 212
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 110
Replace Liesbeth Woertman with:
Liesbeth Woertman Netherlands
Helena Lewis‐Smith United Kingdom
Megan Roehrig United States
Gemma Tatangelo Australia
Giulia Ballarotto Italy
Uwe Berger Germany
Sarah Mitchell United Kingdom
Douglas Farnill Australia
Beverley K. Mendelson Canada
Gemma Sharp relative to Liesbeth Woertman Netherlands Liesbeth Woertman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Liesbeth Woertman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Sharp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Sharp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Sharp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Sharp. The network helps show where Gemma Sharp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Sharp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Sharp Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Sharp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020162
2 201690
3 201476
4 202167
5 201662
6 201461
7 202160
8 201160
9 201647
10 202243
11 201643
12 201941
13 202039
14 201935
15 202028
16 202328
17 202025
18 201723
19 201921
20 201521

About Gemma Sharp

Gemma Sharp is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacy and Surgery, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (25 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (18 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (12 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (4 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (617 citations), Applied Psychology (81 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (438 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (212 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (110 citations). Gemma Sharp has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julie Mattiske, Marika Tiggemann, Jayashri Kulkarni, Susan L. Rossell, Simone Buzwell, Toni Pikoos, Caroline Gurvich, Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib, Suku Sukunesan and Shalini Arunogiri. Their work appears in journals such as Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Body Image, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity and International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact