Gemma Sharp

74 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Gemma Sharp
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Clinical Psychology 780
  • Applied Psychology 82
  • Health Informatics 34
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 425
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 107
Replace Glenda L. Wrenn with:
Glenda L. Wrenn United States
Miia Männikkö Spain
Lisa Marzano United Kingdom
Hilkka Kärkkäinen United Kingdom
Matthew P. Hamilton Australia
Rodrigo Ramalho New Zealand
Fiona E. Fox United Kingdom
Sherry Shu‐Yeu Hou United States
Sarah B. Garrett United States
Gemma Sharp relative to Glenda L. Wrenn United States Glenda L. Wrenn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Glenda L. Wrenn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Sharp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Sharp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Sharp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Sharp. The network helps show where Gemma Sharp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Sharp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Sharp Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Sharp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020170
2 2016104
3 201484
4 201676
5 202174
6 201469
7 202163
8 201651
9 201650
10 202250
11 201945
12 202040
13 202338
14 201937
15 202033
16 201728
17 202028
18 201526
19 202223
20 202322

About Gemma Sharp

Gemma Sharp is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy, Applied Psychology and Health Informatics, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (35 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (19 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (17 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (780 citations), Applied Psychology (82 citations), Health Informatics (34 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (425 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (107 citations). Gemma Sharp has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julie K. Mattiske, Marika Tiggemann, Jayashri Kulkarni, Susan Lee Rossell, Toni D. Pikoos, Simone Buzwell, Caroline Gurvich, Suku Sukunesan, Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib and Ranjani Utpala. Their work appears in journals such as Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Body Image, Journal of Medical Internet Research, International Journal of Eating Disorders and Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact