Natalie McClain

404 citations
19 papers · 224 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Health top 10%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Papers in

Natalie McClain

17 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Natalie McClain
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Gender Studies 93
  • Health 68
  • Clinical Psychology 67
  • Urology 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 33
Replace Diane Coleman with:
Diane Coleman United States
Krisztina Hevesi Hungary
Deborah Y. Choi United States
Cara R. Dunkley Canada
Annum Shaikh United States
Aliya R. Webermann United States
Ana Luísa Quinta-Gomes Portugal
Suhas Chandran India
Fabian M. Saleh United States
Robyn A. Ellis United States
Natalie McClain relative to Diane Coleman United States Diane Coleman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Diane Coleman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie McClain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie McClain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie McClain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie McClain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie McClain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie McClain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie McClain. The network helps show where Natalie McClain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie McClain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie McClain Line = papers co-authored together Natalie McClain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200851
2 200642
3
Evaluating the child for sexual abuse.
200132
4 201324
5 202217
6 202217
7
A profile of certification for pediatric nurses.
20048
8 20076
9 20245
10 20245
11 20055
12 20244
13 20003
14 20022
15 20251
16
Examining nutrition among a sample of 3- to 5-year-old children living in rural Jamaica.
20151
17 20251
18 20250
19 20250

About Natalie McClain

Natalie McClain is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Related Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (93 citations), Health (68 citations), Clinical Psychology (67 citations), Urology (15 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (33 citations). Natalie McClain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Bahrain. Frequent co-authors include Sarah L. Anderson, Ralph Riviello, Angela Frederick Amar, Rebecca G. Girardet, Kim Cheung, Rita Z. Goldstein, Ahmet O. Ceceli, Nelly Alia‐Klein, Greg Kronberg and Richard H. Steeves. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Journal of Forensic Nursing, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact