Countries where authors publish in Journal of Forensic Nursing
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Forensic Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Forensic Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Forensic Nursing more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Forensic Nursing
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Forensic Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Forensic Nursing.
About Journal of Forensic Nursing
The 674 papers published in Journal of Forensic Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Forensic Nursing usually cover Gender Studies (176 papers), Health (118 papers), Clinical Psychology (241 papers), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 papers) and Research and Theory (7 papers) specifically the topics of Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (170 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (116 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (100 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (94 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (53 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (53 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (51 papers) and Sex work and related issues (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Forensic Nursing are Kristen R. Choi, Rebecca Campbell, Paul T. Clements, Bennet Omalu, Angela Frederick Amar, Jean Daniel Jacob, Julian E. Bailes, Linda E. Ledray, Dave Holmes and Debra Patterson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.