Natalie Ein
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Papers in
-
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 4
- Resilience and Mental Health 3
- Genetics 6
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Kristin S. Vickers (12 shared papers)Jenny J. W. Liu (14 shared papers)Julia Gervasio (10 shared papers)Vivian Huang (1 shared paper)Katlyn Peck (1 shared paper)Jens C. Pruessner (1 shared paper)Maureen J. Reed (5 shared papers)Micaela Wiseman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Anthrozoös (4 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Journal of Happiness Studies (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)Clinical Psychology Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Natalie Ein
26 papers receiving 837 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Behavioral Neuroscience 160
- Human-Computer Interaction 99
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 23
- Applied Psychology 54
- Clinical Psychology 219
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ein
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ein. The network helps show where Natalie Ein may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Ein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 231 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 218 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 137 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Natalie Ein
Natalie Ein is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (6 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (160 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (99 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (23 citations), Applied Psychology (54 citations) and Clinical Psychology (219 citations). Natalie Ein has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kristin S. Vickers, Jenny J. W. Liu, Julia Gervasio, Vivian Huang, Katlyn Peck, Jens C. Pruessner, Maureen J. Reed, Micaela Wiseman, Jennifer L. Campos and E Appel. Their work appears in journals such as Anthrozoös, PLoS ONE, Journal of Happiness Studies, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.